Documented Pattern of Alleged
Fraud and Deceptive Practices

Dustin Mansell – Las Vegas, Nevada

An Investigative Report Based on Firsthand Financial Loss, Communications, and Records

   
    The legal disclaimer is first on this page, followed by the video proof, and the image and written proof is at the bottom of the page for your review!

 

    What follows is a factual, evidence-driven account based on my personal financial losses, preserved communications, transaction records, and corroborating testimony from others who report similar experiences. This is not speculation, gossip, or harassment. It is documentation.

    The length and depth of this report reflect the scope of the conduct involved.

Overview

    Based on my investigation, Dustin Mansell of Las Vegas, Nevada has been repeatedly involved in business ventures that follow a consistent and troubling pattern:

    1) Promotion of income opportunities framed as “investments”

    2) Rapid onboarding and payment collection

    3) Aggressive lifestyle marketing used as credibility leverage

    4) Payment processor issues, shutdowns, or forced closures

    5) Unpaid commissions, denied refunds, and deflection of responsibility

    6) Victims told to “move on” while losses remain unresolved

    This pattern appears across multiple ventures, timeframes, and groups of participants.

My Direct Financial Loss

    In my own case, the documented losses include:

    1) Nearly $2,000 in unpaid commissions

    2) Just under $4,000 charged to personal credit cards

    3) Additional charges to family debit and credit accounts

    These funds were paid under representations of participation in legitimate business opportunities. The funds were not returned, and contractual or implied payment obligations were not fulfilled.

    Despite repeated assertions by Mr. Mansell that I allegedly earned “10X to 100X” returns, transaction records and payment histories show otherwise.

    Had such returns occurred, documented payouts would reflect between $40,000 and $400,000. They do not.

Contradictory Statements and Payment Processing Conduct

    Mr. Mansell repeatedly stated—both publicly and privately—that his Stripe account had been “shut down.” However:

    1) Credit card charges continued after these statements

    2) Memberships were not cancelled upon request

    3) Charges persisted for ventures that had already ceased operations

   Merchant account termination is not arbitrary. It typically results from excessive chargebacks, compliance failures, or elevated risk classifications—issues that legitimate, compliant businesses do not routinely encounter.

    The forced shutdown of allegedly profitable ventures due to payment processing issues directly contradicts claims of operational success.

Lifestyle Promotion vs. Financial Outcomes

    Throughout these ventures, Mr. Mansell publicly showcased a lifestyle of frequent travel, luxury dining, and leisure. This type of marketing is commonly used to imply business legitimacy and financial success.

    Yet participants—including myself—were left with unpaid balances, unanswered inquiries, and unrecovered funds.

    This contrast is not incidental. It is a recognized tactic in deceptive marketing and confidence-based schemes, where perceived success is leveraged to attract new capital rather than reflecting sustainable operations.

Use of Associates and Repeated Venture Cycling

    Evidence suggests that multiple individuals, including close associates and family members, were involved in promoting, administering, or facilitating these ventures.

    When examined collectively, the repeated launch-collect-collapse cycle raises questions about whether these operations were ever intended to function as long-term businesses—or whether they were designed primarily for short-term capital extraction.

Regulatory and Criminal Implications

    Based on the documented conduct, these matters may reasonably fall within the review authority of:

    1) Federal Trade Commission (FTC) — deceptive trade practices and misrepresentation

    2) Nevada Attorney General — consumer fraud and unfair business practices

    3) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) — wire fraud and interstate financial activity

    RICO statutes — if a demonstrable pattern of coordinated activity, repeated schemes, and multiple victims is established

    This report does not declare guilt. It documents conduct and patterns that warrant formal investigation by agencies tasked with enforcing consumer protection and fraud statutes.

Call for Other Affected Individuals

    Statements are intended for regulatory and law-enforcement review, not public disclosure.

    Patterns only become prosecutable when victims come forward.

Conclusion

    This investigation was conducted independently, over several months, using firsthand evidence, preserved communications, financial records, and corroborating reports from others.

    While minor errors or duplications may exist due to the volume of material reviewed, the core facts remain unchanged:

    1) Funds were collected

    2) Obligations were not honored

    3) Refunds and commissions were withheld

    4) Responsibility was deflected

    The evidence speaks for itself.

Legal Disclaimer

    This report reflects personal experiences, documented transactions, preserved communications, and publicly available information. All statements are made in good faith and are intended for informational, consumer-protection, and investigative purposes only.

    No statements herein constitute a declaration of criminal guilt. References to laws, statutes, or regulatory agencies are descriptive, not accusatory, and are included to identify potential areas of lawful review.

    Readers are encouraged to examine the evidence independently and reach their own conclusions.

    PS  Just because I vent a bit on my write-ups, and in my videos, it is my right to do so, as this is my Free Speech, and I am giving the facts as they are, with the proof, along with some funny memes, graphics, and other things to make these write-ups entertaining to you the visitor. My OPINION is just that, an OPINION, and OPINIONS are just like, well, you know...

 

    PS - If a video does not want to play after watching a video or two, simply refresh your browser to get the next one to play properly, or, in worse case, simply download the video to watch on your PC.